This articles presents the current universalism vs cultural relativism debate of children’s rights applied to the issue of child soldiers’ disarmament, demobilization and reintegration (DDR) programs. Following a brief description of both perspectives and of the most common DDR programs, we present what each perspective identifies in the literature as being the main problems and best practices of DDR programs and how these widely differing problems and best practices reflect the current impasse of the larger philosophical debate. In an effort to move away from this impasse in a pragmatic manner, we recommend the development of programming by a multidisciplinary team of experts who can come to paint a multifaceted and grounded understanding of the conflict and the environment into which the child soldier must reintegrate, thereby creating programming that is both respectful of fundamental human rights and adaptable to the complex reality of each individual child soldier.
Latest News from the Feinstein Interntional Center
- Foraging and Fighting -- Community Perspectives on Natural Resources and Conflict in Southern Karamoja
- Towards a "Great Transformation"? The Maoist Insurgency and Local Perceptions of Social Transformation in Nepal
- Savings and Chance -- Learning from the Lottery to Improve Financial Services in Haiti
- Institutional Assessment Report -- Tsaeda Amba Woreda, Eastern Tigray, Ethiopia
- New Research on the State of the Humanitarian Enterprise
- The Journal of Humanitarian Assistance is published by the Feinstein International Center, part of the Gerald J. and Dorothy R. Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy at Tufts University.


RSS feed of published articles